Strategi Pengambilan Keputusan Pengembangan Pendidikan Tinggi Vokasi Kemaritiman Studi Kasus pada Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Semarang

Main Article Content

Rufiajid Navy Abritia F Pambudi Widiatmaka Yustina Sapan Nur Rohmah

Abstract

The demands of changes in the global era have made vocational higher education have a strategic role and are at the forefront in handling the age of the workforce. Vocational higher education is programmed to produce graduates who have mastery of science and technology, are independent, skilled and trained in accordance with the demands of the industrial world or the world of work. The learning outcomes are needed as capital in facing regional and global competition. One of the strategies for decision-making in the development of maritime vocational higher education that was developed to be able to maintain its existence and be more developed in order to produce graduates who are in accordance with the times so that it must have a strategy to achieve it, namely by using the SWOT matrix method approach and the QSPM matrix. Based on the results of the SWOT matrix data processing and the QSPM matrix, it can be concluded that the Director can make a decision to open a new study program, rather than building a new campus which takes longer, with the consequence that new study programs S2 and S3 study in the afternoon while waiting for the construction of a new campus as a the second alternative.


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Alamanda, D. T., Anggadwita, G., … Kijima, K. (2019). Designing Strategies using IFE, EFE, IE, and QSPM analysis: Digital Village Case. The Asian Journal of Technology Management (AJTM), 12(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.12695/ajtm.2019.12.1.4
Anastasiou, A., & Androutsou, D. (2009). The importance of SWOT Analysis for educational units that belong to the field of Vocational Education and Training: The case of the State Institute (IEK) of Epanomi in Thessaloniki, Greece. (September 2009), 24–25.
David, Fred R.; David, Forest R. (2017). Strategic Management – A Competitive Advantage Approach, Concepts and Cases, 16th Edition. UK : Pearson.
Dermawan, R. (2004). Pengambilan keputusan: Landasan Filosofis. Konsep dan Aplikasi, Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
Karkehabadi, Z., & Shamsi, K. (2017). Investigating the Challenges and Opportunities Affecting Tourism Using SWOT and QPSM Techniques (The Case Study of Galugah District). Journal of Tourism Hospitality Research, 6(2), 81–103.
Mahmoodi, Maryam., Chizari, Mohammad,. Kalantari, Khalil,. Eftekhari, Abdolreza. The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) Applied To Agri-Tourism : A Case Study in Coastal Provinces of Iran. IJBTS International Journal of Business Tourism and Applied Sciences Vol.2 No.2 July-December2014
Mohammad Shamsy, N., Nori, L., Faisal, M. M., Billah, S. M., Tonomy, N. H., & Mhd Sarif, S. (2018). Keeping schlumberger way. Resear, (December). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23273.13924
Orr, B. (2012). Conducting a S.W.O.T. Analysis for Program Improvement. 3(6), 381–384. https://doi.org/10.5176/2251-1814_eel12.18

Rangkuti, Freddy, 2008, Analisis SWOT Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis, Gramedia Pustaka, Jakarta
Republik Indonesia, 2002. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2002. Sekretariat Negara, Jakarta.
Salusu, J. (2015). Pengambilan keputusan stratejik. Gramedia Widiasarana.
Sarwono, Jonathan, 2011, Mixed Methods Cara Menggabungkan Riset Kuantitatif dan Riset Kualitatif Secara Benar, Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta
Sumarno, A. (2012). Perbedaan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pengembangan.
Sohel, S. M., Rahman, A. M. A., & Uddin, M. A. (2014). Competitive profile matrix (CPM) as a competitors’ analysis tool: A theoretical perspective. International Journal of Human Potential Development, 3(3), 40–47.
Tafti, S. F., Jalili, E., & Yahyaeian, L. (2013). Assessment and Analysis Strategies according to Space Matrix-case Study: Petrochemical and Banking Industries in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 893–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.562